It’s March 1, and before we move on from our February reading, I want to comment on Chapter Three of The Wise Heart. It is, I believe, one of the clearest and most enlightening explanations of consciousness I’ve heard or read. I’ve been wanting to write about since I read it three months ago, but to tell the truth, I think I’ve been intimidated to try to respond to the big idea of this chapter. Until Katie helped me.
Kornfield says, “Unless we grasp the nature and function of consciousness, it is impossible to live wisely.” The third principle of Buddhist psychology. He goes on to say, “The capacity to be mindful, to observe without being caught in our experience, is both remarkable and liberating.”
And remarkable is exactly the right word. We can learn to separate what is happening in our small self world from the big space, open heart, pure consciousness state that we simultaneously participate in. Small “ s” self / Big “s” Self. This has been a big lesson for me, one that has taken several years to “get.” The experience that we’re having in these bodies he likens to watching a channel on TV. Our experience is a part of consciousness (“all states are simply appearances in consciousness”), and we have the capacity to change the channel (shift consciousness to a new identity or sense of self) any time we care to. Isn’t that amazing??
Last weekend I attended a conference given by Philip Golabuk, creator and founder of The Field Center. “Field training” is a very practical methodology of applying this principle of Buddhist psychology. FT posits this: if I am experiencing a version of myself in which I do not take pleasure, then, because all states are appearances in consciousness, I have the power to change that with which I identify. And in fact, we do this all the time, Golabuk says, wittingly or unwittingly. We cannot not do it because we are all of us (and this whole world we move in) manifestations of consciousness.
Here’s an example of unwitting identification. Last week, a first-year student of mine, Katie, asserted that she is not a good test taker and that’s why she is getting a D in chemistry. I pointed out to her that her statement about her test-taking abilities is not actually a fact, but merely a “story” she has created about herself. (Sometimes, the stories we create are protective mechanisms that very conveniently keep us from the truth, which means they keep us from the hard work of embracing who we really want to be.) When I pointed this out, she denied my statement saying over and over that she has never taken tests well and that is just the way she is. (It’s amazing how vehemently we humans will argue for our own deficiencies!) Then, I asked Katie if she liked being that way. Surprised by the question, she had to think a while. As she thought, I said, “Katie! Do you really have to think about this? Do you enjoy being the kind of person who does not take tests well?” Backed into such a corner, she finally said no, grudgingly. And then I asked her if she wanted to change that version of herself she’d been carrying around (and defending) for ten years or so. And of course, the protestations started all over again. “Well, of course I’d like to be different, but I’m not. That’s just the way it is. My mother had the same trouble in college and she dropped out after her sophomore year.”
Oh my god, the way we cling to our stories. What would happen, I wondered, if this young woman could really “get” that this version of herself is merely “an appearance” of consciousness? I wasn’t trying to disabuse her of the “reality” of her story right now. It is very true that, in her current state of awareness, she is, in fact, a lousy test-taker. She has finely cultivated that identity for herself and it is manifesting all over the place. In fact, it may manifest her right out of college. But I was also keenly aware that this “reality” is something that she has created, not something that perforce has to exist in the universe. And I thought of Kornfield again, reminding us that “we can learn to change the channels” ( i.e.,the stories and states) of our lives that we assume to be fixed in perpetuity.
And of course, Katie was my great teacher on that day. I, too, could ask myself, “Do you enjoy being the kind of person who (fill in blank with a dozen different qualities or conditions)? Then change the channel, Lezlie.
Recent Comments