I felt myself getting all worked up recently during two separate conversations with two different friends about the same essay in the New York Times. The author wrote about a time -- two decades into her marriage -- when her husband told her, “I don’t love you anymore. I’m not sure I ever did. I’m moving out. The kids will understand. They’ll want me to be happy.” But the piece is not about her personal pain, or about divorce (he doesn't move out) -- it's about how she didn't buy into his words and subsequent unreliable behavior, but rather cooly gave him the "distance" he needed (for six months) while she explained to their kids, "“Daddy’s having a hard time as adults often do."
I got worked up just now as I re-read the essay several times, and even more now that I am writing about it. Why? Because (and let me steal the words she used to deflect her husband's hateful words): I don't buy it.
"How could she remain so cool?" I asked both of my friends.
One friend: "Maybe she's a Buddhist."
Me: "Yeah, maybe she's the Dalai Lama."
(I think I just scared the other friend with how upset this essay made me. I haven't heard from him since.)
I have no doubt the writer has studied Buddhism. She writes, "You see, I’d recently committed to a non-negotiable understanding with
myself. I’d committed to 'The End of Suffering.' I’d finally managed to
exile the voices in my head that told me my personal happiness was only
as good as my outward success, rooted in things that were often outside
my control. I’d seen the insanity of that equation and decided to take
responsibility for my own happiness. And I mean all of it." By writing the essay she wants to help, "People who feel scared and stuck. Who believe their temporary feelings are permanent."
Recent Comments